It can be easy to think that the age of “alternative
facts” is something new. Somehow, humans have never been susceptible to
inaccuracy on such a wide scale until now. While the failed reality TV show
host running America may have made this trait more overt than ever before,
falsehoods have always had a prominent place in American society. Supermarket
tabloids claiming that “Elvis is alive!” have always existed. Politicians who
spread smears about marginalized populations have always been around. And
journalists, like Shattered Glass lead Stephen Glass (Hayden
Christensen), have always been capable of spreading lies for their own benefit.
As we begin Shattered Glass, though, Stephen
Glass is not portrayed as someone who lies. Instead, we are introduced to him
talking to a room full of kids at his old school. In this framing device, he’s
taking these youngsters, who all want to get into the writing industry, through
his job working for The New Republic. This is a publication read by world
leaders around the world, including the President of the United States. What
Glass and his coworkers have written influence people with real authority. That’s
why Glass takes his job so seriously. Through his explanations to the students
(and, by proxy, to the viewer) about how an average New Republic article is put
together, we can see just how much work goes into a single New Republic
article.
Glass proves to be a great person to clarify how a New
Republic magazine gets made. Glass has a quietly charismatic air about him that
he uses to woo over his co-workers. He can win anyone in this office over by
complimenting their writing, their jewelry, any specific quality about them.
That same affable quality is ingeniously used to make the exposition about the
New Republic digestible to the viewer. Glass isn’t counting a stiff Wikipedia summary
of this publication. He’s trying to take his listeners on a journey that
emphasizes the sheer majesty of working for something like New Republic. You’re
hanging onto his every word as he speaks. Meanwhile, the editing from Jeffrey
Ford deftly cuts between Glass in the classroom and the various departments
working together to bring this magazine to life. The rapid but precise sense of
timing in these cuts conveys the idea that everybody is connected at New
Republic.
The screenplay by Billy Ray (who also directs) is so
effective at getting the viewer to be cast under Glass’ spell. That make the
gradual reveal that something is askew with his writing (namely that Glass is
making up his stories) hits like a ton of bricks. In this regard, Shattered
Glass reminded me of this years similarly top-notch movie Bad Education.
Both derive a lot of engrossing entertainment out of peeling back the layers of
lies surrounding an influential human being. Also in both cases, the levels of
fraud reveal themselves in a gradual manner.
In the case of Shattered Glass, such reveals
beautifully play off earlier scenes of the movie that immerse us in the
perspective of Stephen Glass. Ray’s writing and directing is so good at establishing
a sense of trustworthiness between the viewer and Glass. This character lures
us into their world and creates a seemingly unshakeable status quo we can hold
onto. As it becomes more and more clear what Glass has actually been up to,
well, it becomes downright engrossing to watch the world shift beneath the
viewers’ feet. Both the lying and the moviegoer are fascinatingly dragged back into
reality, primarily at the hands of New Republic editor Charles Lane (Peter
Sarsgaard).
Lane is an excellent example of the kind of thoughtful
writing Billy Ray incorporates throughout Shattered Glass. His character is widely
derided by his co-workers as just a one-note killjoy. But the film itself
always gives Lane a greater deal of complexity. This is evident early on when
Lane, upon being offered a very lucrative new job, doesn’t just revel in the
idea of more power. He expresses genuine trepidation over taking on this new
job and how it’ll affect his co-workers. Throughout the rest of the movie, Lane
maintains this level of nuance in the face of a protagonist with a warped
worldview casting himself as a put-upon martyr.
Glass starts out Shattered Glass as an irresistible
individual you could listen to for hours on end. Why wouldn’t schoolkids hang
on his every word? Glass ends Shattered Glass sitting alone in an empty
schoolroom. Like much of his writing, Glass’ experience of talking to the next
generation of newspaper writers was all in his head. The journey from the hopeful
start of Shattered Glass to its somber end is one rife made even more
compelling by the lead performances of Hayden Christensen and Peter Sarsgaard. Both
take their respective characters into such unexpected yet riveting directions
throughout the course of Shattered Glass. In their performances, both actors
demonstrate how the fight against falsified information posing as the truth is
nothing new. What’s old is new again. It’s scary how timeless this story is. On
the other hand, it’s far more pleasing how timeless well-made movies like Shattered
Glass are.
No comments:
Post a Comment