In his excellent book Five Came Back, author Mark
Harris chronicles the exploits of five famous filmmakers as they work shooting
films in the trenches of World War II. One of these directors was George Stevens,
who was most famous for his work in light-hearted comedies. It was a genre he’d
never return to once he came home from the war. While abroad, Stevens encountered
survivors of a concentration camp. Being exposed to the most horrific horrors human
beings could create altered his mindset. Stevens no longer wanted to make
frothy comedies. If he was going to make any kind of movie, he wanted to make
something that reflected the very real consequences of violence.
It’s impossible to detach Stevens’ experiences in
World War II with Shane, a Western that departs heavily from standard
entries in this genre. Gunslinging cowboys are not figures of bad-assery while violence
itself tends to create more problems than it solves. The titular lead,
portrayed by Alan Ladd, is a figure wandering the land with no real purpose until
he comes onto the property of Joe Starrett (Van Helfin). Starrett lives here
with his wife, Marian (Jean Arthur), and Joey (Brandon deWilde), though they’re
in a constant battle for their land against Rufus Ryker (Emile Meyer). Shane
decides to stick around and help keep things tidy around the Starrett household,
though the escalating cruelty of Ryker means it’s only a matter of time before
a showdown is to be had.
A. B. Guthrie Jr. and Jack Sher’s screenplay doesn’t
just use violence as a go-to signifier for villainy. Detachment is also utilized
as an indictor that a human being has lost their way. The worst characters in
Shane, like Ryker or his hired hitman Jack Wilson (Walter Jack Palance), don’t
care about people. They care about land, they care about power, they care about
money, but other human beings? Not so much. It’s the same sort of detachment
that underlies any form of prejudice, including the anti-Semitism, racism and
homophobia that drove the Nazi regime. Once you fail to see another human being
as a person, you don’t have any remorse when you commit acts of cruelty against
them.
Detachment is just as dangerous as a flying bullet in
the Wild West of Shane. Considering this interpretation, Guthrie Jr. and
Sher imbue the climax of Shane with a welcome sense of complexity. The titular
character becomes about as far away from detached as you can get as he sets out
to confront Ryker on his own so that the Starrett family doesn’t lose Joe.
However, in doing so, he must embrace violence. It’s a conceptually noble act
that still requires Shane to sacrifice some of his own humanity. To boot, the
lingering consequences of this violence means that Shane cannot stick around
with the Starrett family in the long-term. Even seemingly heroic deeds come at
a cost in the world of Shane.
George Stevens’ direction of Shane’s final showdown
and the other brawls throughout Shane emphasize that this movie is trying to
take a rawer rather than grandiose approach to violence. We’re not supposed
to be excited by people firing guns at each other, we’re supposed to be conscious
of the human lives dangling in the balance. This is especially apparent n a
fantastically executed sequence where Wilson is prowling around Frank Torrey
(Elisha Cook Jr.). Stevens’ restrained camerawork and the slow pace of the
scene makes the tension unbearable. You can feel something ominous drawing
closer and closer with each footstep Torrey
takes.
Meanwhile, Stevens’ and cinematographer Loyal Griggs lend a luscious look to the homestead of the Starrett family and the surrounding valley. Pools of deep blue water and bright green foliage litter the landscape that the Starrett family and their neighbors call home. It’s a locale so gorgeous looking that you immediately understand why these families would want to fight back against Ryker to keep it. Plus, such a vibrant-looking backdrop is totally unique for the Western genre, which tend to take place in more sparse tableaus with muted color palettes. It’s yet another instance of Shane eschewing conventions of the Western genre to create something quite engaging, particularly in the context of how it reflects George Stevens post-WWII psyche.
No comments:
Post a Comment